Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lawson v. Bolton, et al
as 26-3103
Plaintiff:
ANGELIINA LYNN LAWSON
Defendant:
ANDREW BOLTON, THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, LLC, DARRELL ROBINSON and others
Lawson v. Godderz, et al
as 26-3104
Plaintiff:
ANGELIINA LYNN LAWSON
Defendant:
ERIC W. GODDERZ, TAYLOR J. WINE, JOHN BRYANT and others
Lawson v. Bolton, et al
as 25-3215
Plaintiff:
ANGELIINA LYNN LAWSON
Defendant:
ANDREW BOLTON, THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, LLC, DARRELL ROBINSON and others
Lawson v. Bolton, et al
as 25-3167
Plaintiff:
ANGELIINA LYNN LAWSON
Defendant:
ANDREW BOLTON, THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, LLC, DARRELL ROBINSON and others
In re: Lawson
as 25-3158
Petitioner:
ANGELIINA LYNN LAWSON
Respondent:
ERIC W. GODDERZ, TAYLOR J. WINE, JOHN BRYANT and others
Lawson v. Godderz et al
as 6:2025cv01179
Plaintiff:
Angeliina Lynn Lawson
Defendant:
Eric W. Godderz, Taylor J. Wine, John Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lawson v. Bolton et al
as 2:2025cv02251
Defendant:
Andrew Bolton, Bolton Law Firm, LLC, The, Darrell Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Angeliina Lynn Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hockensmith et al v. Robert Bosch GmbH et al
as 6:2018cv01885
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Lust, William Harry Maze, William Rothermel and others
Defendant:
VM Motori S.p.A, Ford Motor Company, FCA US LLC, F/K/A Chrysler Group and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
RYPIEN v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01496
Plaintiff:
MARK RYPIEN , TERRY HANRATTY , KELLY HANRATTY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYPIEN v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as PAE/2:12-cv-01496
Plaintiff:
MARK RYPIEN , TERRY HANRATTY , KELLY HANRATTY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
