Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,437
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant: Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner: Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent: E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Grable v. Oliver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff: Felenthean Grable
Defendant: Tyrone Oliver, Andrew McFarlane and Veronica Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. Babb et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff: Todd Andrew
Defendant: Sheriff Barry H. Babb and Fayette County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Mcneal v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff: Andrew Mcneal
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Lavorado et al
as 6:2024cv00531
Petitioner: James Jonathan Mitchell
Respondent: M Lavorado, Daiquiri Duncan, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Segal
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff: Nicholos Kirk Roberts
Defendant: Andrew John Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Andrews v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10683
Plaintiff: JOHN ANDREWS
Defendant: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?