Cases 21 - 30 of 1,017
Eckstein v. Ores et al.
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Eckstein
Defendant:
Parole Officer Craig Ores and Brian Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Andrew Taylor
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eiselstein v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00276
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eiselstein
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stevens v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Stevens
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dad's Place of Bryan, Ohio v. City of Bryan et al.
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Dad's Place of Bryan, Ohio
Defendant:
City of Bryan, Mayor Carrie Schlade, Jamie Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tritschler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ANDREW TIMOTHY TRITSCHLER
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bork v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bork
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
