Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Cruz v. Munroe HMA Hospital, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Angel Cruz
Defendant:
Munroe HMA Hospital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Frias-Danzot v. USA
as 3:2017cv01229
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Cruz-Danzot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cruz v. Krueger
as 1:2016cv01500
Petitioner:
Joe Angel Cruz
Respondent:
J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Cruz-Salas et al
as 3:2016cv02974
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Angel Cruz-Salas, Maria Martinez-Perez and Conjugal Partnership Cruz-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II v. Cruz Salas et al
as 3:2015cv02790
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company II
Defendant:
Angel Cruz-Salas, Maria Martinez-Perez and Conjugal Partnership Cruz Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Miguel Cruz-Danzot
as 15-2185
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL CRUZ-DANZOT
Cruz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02721
Plaintiff:
Angel Cruz
Defendant:
The City of New York , The New York City Department of Corrections, Guzzon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Pagan-Miranda et al v. General Services Administration (GSA) et al
as 3:2014cv01654
Plaintiff:
Maritza Pagan-Miranda , Angel Cruz-Cotto and Conjugal Partnership Cruz-Pagan
Defendant:
General Services Administration (GSA), United States of America, Daniel Tangherlini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Angel Cruz-Juarez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72249
Petitioner:
ANGEL CRUZ-JUAREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Cruz Castro v. Southeast Linen Associates, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01724
Plaintiff:
Angel Cruz Castro
Defendant:
Southeast Linen Associates, Inc. and Florida's Finest Linen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
