Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clark v. Washington State Department of Health et al
as 2:2023cv01558
Plaintiff:
Brooklynn C Clark
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Health, Angie Schulz, Scott Bramhall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv06007
Plaintiff:
Carlos E Castillo
Defendant:
Marty Brown , Shaunta Hyde , Jay Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ensley v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Angie M. Ensley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Area v. ANGI Energy Systems, Inc et al
as 3:2012cv05147
Defendant:
ANGI Energy Systems, Inc. and ANGI Energy Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Area
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Casualty Company of Reading, PA v. Pecora, et al
as 3:2011cv05322
Plaintiff:
American Casualty Company of Reading, PA
Defendant:
Scott Pecora, Kelly Bell, Penelope Steers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Estes et al v. US Airways Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Angie Estes and Leo Estes
Defendant:
US Airways Inc and US Airways Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ward v. Nucon Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Shane Ward
Defendant:
Nucon Services Inc, F/V Angie C, Robert Warmenhoven and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
