Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Gerald Bush v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 13-1717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RONATIA BENTEN and others
BROWN et al v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2011cv06421
Plaintiff:
JANICE BROWN and MAURICE WEST
Defendant:
KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, FRED FABER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Deborah Young v. Alice Dubow, et al
as 10-3460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH M. YOUNG, NATURAL GUARDIAN OF C.D. AND B.D., MINORS, IN OUR OWN RIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
ALICE B. DUBOW, JUDGE, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY FOR CAUSING PROLONGED CHILD ABUSE BY FAILING TO ENFORCE HER VERY OWN "STANDING ORDER FOR COURTROOM H" RULES, ANGELE MARIE PARKER, CEO, CHEREL FERRELL, SOCIAL WORKER EMPLOYEE METHODIST SERVICES FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN ("METHODIST KINSHIP") IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL, AND FEDERAL GRANT FUNDED CAPACITIES AS BENEFICIARIES OF KIDNAP FOR PROFIT AND PROLONGED CHILD ABUSE and others
CLAYTON v. EBERWEIN et al
as 2:2009cv05703
Plaintiff:
KIRT CLAYTON, SR.
Defendant:
BILL EBERWEIN, CAROLYNN EBERWEIN, KEVIN DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAYTON v. CHIDRENS CHOICE et al
as 2:2009cv05727
Plaintiff:
KIRT W. CLAYTON, BARBARA E. CLAYTON and MARC ANTHONY CLAYTON
Defendant:
CHIDRENS CHOICE, BILL EBERWEIN, KEVIN DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. DUBOW et al
as 2:2009cv05015
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH M. YOUNG
Defendant:
ALICE BECK DUBOW, ANGELE MARIE PARKER, CHEREL FERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEE et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2009cv04945
Plaintiff:
WADE D. LEE and TANEIDA P. LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, ESTELLE B. RICHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
