Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Leo v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40021
Petitioner:
Anthony M Leo
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. Divris et al
as 1:2024cv10089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barker
Defendant:
Matthew Divris, Anthony Findley and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rios v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2023cv11571
Plaintiff:
Ray L. Rios
Defendant:
Anthony Stevenson, Dean Grey, Michael Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Old Colony Correctional Center (OCCC) et al
as 1:2023cv11538
Plaintiff:
Ray Luis Rios
Defendant:
Old Colony Correctional Center (OCCC) and Charleston A. Stevenson
Consolidated Defendant:
Anthony Stevenson, Dean Grey and Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Graulau et al v. Turco et al
as 1:2023cv10129
Plaintiff:
Luis Graulau and Jose Collazo
Defendant:
Secretary Thomas Turco, Carol Mici, Paul Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. Houle et al
as 1:2023cv10049
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Schultz
Defendant:
Keith R. Houle, Officer Lawson, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bah v. Correctional Officer Davis
as 1:2023cv10021
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bah
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horne v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv12027
Petitioner:
Anthony W. Horne
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
