Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Porter et al v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Porter and Marvin Porter
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Bryan Bailey, Brett McAlpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DiSalvo v. Sonnier et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lorne Anthony DiSalvo
Defendant:
David Sonnier, John Doe and City of Biloxi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dedeaux v. Hancock County et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant:
Hancock County, City of Bay St. Louis, MS, Anthony Gambino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Varaksa v. City of McComb et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Varaksa
Defendant:
City of McComb, McComb Police Department and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anthony v. Welker et al
as 3:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Anthony
Defendant:
Jonathon Welker, Jacob Lang and City of Pearl, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
