Cases 1 - 10 of 3,387
Ortiz et al v. DCFS et al
as 1:2024cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ana Ortiz, Anthony Ortiz and Antonio Bryant
Defendant:
DCFS, Ruth Mejias, Theresa Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Webb v. Quintairos, Prieto, Boyer & Wood, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv04082
Plaintiff:
John Webb
Defendant:
Quintairos, Prieto, Boyer & Wood, P.A., Maxson Mago & Macaulay, LLP, Anthony Schumann and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Canty v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv04028
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Nurse Crane, Nurse Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canty v. Lammer
as 4:2024cv04091
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Knott et al v. Frerichs et al
as 3:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
David Knott and United Asset Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Michael W Frerichs, Mario Treto, Jr., Edward R Bonifas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mosley v. County Of Will et al
as 1:2024cv03792
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
County Of Will, Nicolas Keedy, Anthony Gomez Delacasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
