Cases 1 - 10 of 11
IN RE: BUSSIE
as 2:2024cv03159
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05479
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BUSSIE v. BUMB et al
as 2:2014cv04512
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Respondent:
RENEE BUMB and ROBERT E. ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUSSIE et al v. NEW JERSEY STATE PUBLIC LAW AND SAFETY et al
as 2:2014cv00971
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PUBLIC LAW AND SAFETY, CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSSIE et al v. BOEHNER
as 2:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
JOHN BOEHNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BUSSIE
as 2:2014cv00261
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BUSSIE v. CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT IN NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2013cv04898
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT IN NEW JERSEY, INTENSIVE SUPERVISOR PROGRAM NEW JERSEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSSIE v. BOEHNER et al
as 2:2013cv01602
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
JOHN BOEHNER, FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER WARDEN, PATRICK LEAHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSSIE et al v. BUMB et al
as 2:2012cv07085
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RENEE M. BUMB, TOM YOUNG, DIANIA CARRIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONJURE UP ENTERTAINMENT et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICAN et al
as 2:2011cv02520
Plaintiff:
CONJURE UP ENTERTAINMENT and ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICAN, UNITED STATE DISTRICT NJ, COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
