Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Hernandez et al v. Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse
as 1:2022cv03300
Plaintiff:
Justin Andrew Hernandez and Dustin Anthony Hernandez
Defendant:
Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dutschmann v. Life Care Services et al
as 6:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Wanda Dutschmann and Marcie Schreck
Defendant:
Life Care Services, City of Waco, Mayor Dillon Meek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019cv02388
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Michael Bradley, Christopher Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harley v. Streamlicensing Networks LLC et al
as 1:2018cv09528
Defendant:
Michael Kraines, Access Self Storage, IO2 Media and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy Harley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Innis et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Innis , Rashard Innis , Larry Daily and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Corey Maguire and John and Jane Doe #1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bramscher v. Qucik et al
as 1:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
William Robert Bramscher
Defendant:
Don (I) Quick, Don Quick, Daniel (I) Thomas Brechbuhl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnville v. Mimosa Cafe et al
as 1:2014cv00518
Plaintiff:
Reginald Barnville
Defendant:
Mimosa Cafe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
