Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Merrick v. Herman
as 2:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Kenneth Herman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Merrick v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
David Shinn, Dianne Miller, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Merrick v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01957
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. USA
as 4:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Prince Anthony James Kelly, Anthony James Kelly, Michael Parmel Holmes and others
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Merrick v. Ryan
as 2:2019cv05525
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, David Shinn, Ronald Towles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05494
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Kenneth Herman, Charles L Ryan, Marion R Kidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00172
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Anthony James Merrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merrick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01113
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , Unknown Herman and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cianciolo v. Ryan et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cianciolo
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health and Richard Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00124
Petitioner:
Anthony James Merrick
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
