Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Andrew Kundratic v. Tina Polachek-Gartley, et al
as 15-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW KUNDRATIC
Defendant - Appellee:
TINA POLACHEK-GARTLEY, ANTHONY LUMBIS, GARY THOMAS and others
Kundratic v. Polachek-Gartley et al
as 3:2015cv01239
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kundratic
Defendant:
Tina Polachek-Gartley, Anthony Lumbis, Gary Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Kundratic v. Gary Thomas, et al
as 13-4627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW KUNDRATIC
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY THOMAS, ANTHONY LUMBIS, TINA GARTLEY and others
McAndrew et al v. Heartman et al
as 3:2013cv02256
Plaintiff:
Kristen McAndrew and Jocelyn McAndrew
Defendant:
Sherri Seiwell Heartman, Kelly Reinheimer Horning, Emily Teil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kundratic v. Thomas et al
as 3:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kundratic
Defendant:
Gary Thomas, Anthony Lumbis, Tina Gartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Naparsteck v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare et al
as 3:2011cv01546
Plaintiff:
Noah Naparsteck
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Luzerne County , Children and Youth Services of Luzerne County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Napersteck v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare et al
as 3:2011cv01545
Plaintiff:
Noah Napersteck
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Luzerne County, Children and Youth Services of Luzerne County , Elizabeth Lozozky-Laylo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naparsteck v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare et al
as 3:2011cv01544
Plaintiff:
Noah Naparsteck
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Luzerne County , Children and Youth Services of Luzerne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
