Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARBAJAL v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2018cv00523
Plaintiff:
DEAN CARBAJAL
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., SONIA SOTOMAYOR, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery Sibley v. Supreme Court of the United S, et al
as 11-5164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Montgomery Blair Sibley
Defendant - Appellee:
Supreme Court of the United States, John G. Roberts, Samuel A. Alito, Jr. and others
Gregory Krug v. John Roberts, et al
as 11-5162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Charles Krug
Defendant - Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and others
In re: Montgomery Sibley
as 10-5414
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Montgomery Blair Sibley
Respondent:
Anthony M. Kennedy
:
, , and others
KRUG v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2010cv02069
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CHARLES KRUG
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., ANTONIN SCALIA, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIBLEY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv01696
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, JOHN G. ROBERTS, SAMUEL ANTHONY ALITO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Jones v. United States Supreme Court, et al
as 10-5222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, William K. Suter, US Supreme Court Clerk of Court, Gail Johnson, US Supreme Court and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
