Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Vedrine v. Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2022at00549
Plaintiff:
Reginald Vedrine
Defendant:
Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC and Marshall Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Vedrine v. Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Reginald Vedrine
Defendant:
Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC and Marshall Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith v. Reardon et al
as 4:2021cv09464
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Reardon and Alameda County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv07397
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
K. Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Madsen et al
as 3:2021cv04590
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
S. Maiorana, H. Madsen and V. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bao Hui Chen et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00850
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith, Baldur Castro, Ying Wang and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Air Force, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
(PC) Smith v. County of Alameda Judges
as 2:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith and Anthony Xavier Smith
Defendant:
County of Alameda Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv08972
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
