Cases 1 - 10 of 172
MOORE v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN D MOORE
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Rupert Tyler Jones
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Brevard County Sheriffs Office and C. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. De Santis et al
as 6:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
Rodger W. Williamson
Defendant:
Ron De Santis, P. A. Mason, Dr. Mosco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 8:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
Dayami Rodriguez
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
PELLETIER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PELLETIER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOBSON v. ARAMARK
as 5:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
KEEVIS R DOBSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadejuste v. Aramark Food Distribution
as 2:2023cv14115
Plaintiff:
Gieuvois Cadejuste
Defendant:
Aramark Food Distribution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Kirby et al
as 6:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Rodger Wayne Williamson
Defendant:
Sergeant J. Kirby, Aramark Corp., Governor Ron DeSantis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 6:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Alston
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Officer Cedano, Officer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
