Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Kennison v. NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jon L. Kennison
Defendant:
NDOC, Kitchen Sgt, Food Services Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagerman v. NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Mark Hagerman
Defendant:
NDOC, Kitchen Sgt, Food Service Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Aramark et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Aramark, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, Aramark Inc., Raul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aramark Management LLC et al v. Borgquist et al
as 2:2022ms00108
Defendant:
Beacon Purchasing LLC, Steve Borgquist, Brent Borgquist and others
Plaintiff:
Aramark Management LLC and HPSI Purchasing Services LLC
Zarate v. Pruitt et al
as 2:2022cv01449
Plaintiff:
Stephen Zarate
Defendant:
Chenel Pruitt, Detective Belt, Sgt Rispowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. ESAB et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Defendant:
Worthington Industries, Inc., Worthington Cylinder Corporation, LLC, ESAB d/b/a Turbotorch and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Michael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miles v. Clark County et al
as 2:2021cv00290
Defendant:
D Lorenza, NaphCare Inc., F Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Stephon Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howard v. Aramark et al
as 2:2020cv01534
Defendant:
Aramark, Wedlow, Bonnie Polley and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
