Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Respondent:
Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Services, Inc. Group Health Plan, Aramark Uniform Services Group Health and Welfare Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
English v. Aramark
as 21-20554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant / Appellee:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, L.L.C.
Earl Anderson v. Aramark Corr Srvs
as 21-3838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, aka Aramark Corporation
Routt v. Hansford, et al
as 21-5051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN STEPHEN ROUTT
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTIN HANSFORD, ARAMARK CORPORATION, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Thomas Powers v. Ashley McCoy, et al
as 19-2804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY MCCOY, JANE DOE 1, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Routt v. Hansford
as 19-5067
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTIN HANSFORD, JOSHUA LANKFORD and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN STEPHEN ROUTT
Jake English v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 19-20412
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE ANTHONY ENGLISH
Brown v. County of Westchester
as 19-1115
Plaintiff:
Candace Brown and Carla Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. Muniz, Craig Doe, Cook, County of Westchester and others
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tonya Hanner
Khan v. Barela, et al
as 19-2056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIK BILAL KHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU BEAM, CHRIS BARELA, JASON DURAN and others
Dale Ewers v. Metro West Detention Center, et al
as 19-10912
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARAMARK CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE AINSLEY LEO EWERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
