Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gilberti v. Buffett et al
as 5:2025cv00176
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Gilberti
Defendant:
Warren Buffett, George W Bush, Donna Marie Padar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6055
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
DEBORAH ALLEN, RONALD BAYER, MITCHELL KATZ and others
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
Catholic Benefits Association, et al v. Burwell, et al
as 16-6313
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CATHOLIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATION LCA, CATHOLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Catholic Benefits Association, et al v. Burwell, et al
as 16-6217
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CATHOLIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATION LCA, CATHOLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Catholic Benefits Association, et al v. Burwell, et al
as 16-6030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CATHOLIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATION LCA, CATHOLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Catholic Benefits Association, et al v. Burwell, et al
as 15-6139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CATHOLIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATION LCA, CATHOLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
