Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Dr. Marshall J Orloff IRA R/O, et al v. Schering Plough Corp, et al
as 13-4328
Plaintiff - Appellant: DR. MARSHALL J ORLOFF and ORLOFF FAMILY TRUST DTD 12/13/01
Plaintiff - Appellee: ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee: SCHERING PLOUGH CORP, FRED HASSAN, ROBERT J. BERTOLINI and others
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Bankrate Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07183
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Defendant: Bankrate Inc., Thomas R. Evans, Edward J. Dimaria and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Spatz et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al Featured Case
as 1:2012cv07586
Plaintiff: Michael Spatz , Sanjay Israni , William H. Anhood and others
Defendant: Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Movant: A. Marcus Gerber , Eiffel Tower Ventures, LLC , The GAF Unit Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Schering-Plough Corp
as 12-8096
Plaintiff - Respondent: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Petitioner: SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION
Defendant - Respondent: FRED HASSAN, ROBERT J. BERTOLINI, STEVEN H. KOEHLER and others
In Re: Schering-Plough Corp
as 12-8098
Plaintiff - Respondent: ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Petitioner: SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION, FRED HASSAN, ROBERT J. BERTOLINI and others
In Re Netflix, Inc., Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00225
Plaintiff: City of Royal Oak Retirement System , Duane Labbee , Frank J. Fish and others
Defendant: Netflix, Inc. , Reed Hastings , David B. Wells and others
Movant: Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund , Alaska Electrical Pension Fund and Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Ambac Financial Group
as 11-4643
Plaintiff: Public School Teachers' Pension & Retirement Fund of Chicago, Arkansas Teachers Retirement System, Public Employees' Retirement Systems of Mississippi and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant - Appellee: Ambac Financial Group, Inc., Robert J. Genader, Phillip B. Lassiter and others
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv05126
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Douglas Dahlgard, Steve Endress and others
Defendant: Gentiva Health Services, Inc., Ronald A. Malone, John R. Potapchuk and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
International Union of Operating Engineers Pension Fund of Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04906
Plaintiff: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Douglas Dahlgard, Steve Endress and others
Defendant: Gentiva Health Services, Inc., Ronald A. Malone, John R. Potapchuk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
George Pappas, et al v. The BOA 401(k) Plan for Legacy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-55570
Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, BARRY BRAHN and others
Objector - Appellant: THE BANK OF AMERICA 401(K) PLAN FOR LEGACY COMPANIES, as a Successor to the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., ANGELO R. MOZILO, ERIC P. SIERACKI and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?