Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
FLORES v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv09120
Defendant: DIRECTOR DAVID S OWENS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BAILEY, SERGEANT TIFFANY DEANGELIS and others
Plaintiff: CARMEN FLORES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv06660
Petitioner: CURTIS L ARNOLD
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARNOLD-DICKENSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv07856
Plaintiff: RUBY ARNOLD-DICKENSON
Defendant: CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. HOLLINGSWORTH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00993
Petitioner: CURTIS L ARNOLD
Respondent: HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REEVES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01795
Petitioner: ARNOLD REEVES
Respondent: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REEVES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv06320
Plaintiff: ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2012cv00038
Petitioner: ARNOLD REEVES
Respondent: DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REEVES v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2010cv05626
Petitioner: ARNOLD REEVES
Respondent: DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REEVES v. F.C.I. FORT DIX et al
as 1:2010cv04554
Petitioner: ARNOLD REEVES
Respondent: F.C.I. FORT DIX and DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reeves v. F.C.I. Fort Dix et al
as 1:2010cv04171
Plaintiff: ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant: F.C.I. FORT DIX, Zickerfoose, FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?