Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Levine et al v. Association of Legal Aid Attorneys UAW Local 2325 et al
as 1:2024cv02733
Plaintiff:
Arnold Levine and Allen S. Popper
Defendant:
Legal Aid Attorneys (ALAA), UAW Local 2325, Legal Aid Society and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
DeRouseau et al v. Family Court et al
as 1:2021cv08716
Plaintiff:
Kyle G. DeRouseau and K.M.D.
Defendant:
Family Court, Judge Arlene (Gordon) Oliver, Eva Bunting Smith, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2021cv08477
Plaintiff:
Arnold H. Thomas
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Bey v. Furman et al
as 1:2021cv04090
Plaintiff:
Lord Sebek Uptown Bey and Frederick Campbell
Defendant:
Mary-Elizabeth Furman, John Doe, Theresa M. Ciccotto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
