Cases 41 - 50 of 258
Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2021cv06247
Plaintiff:
Jill Accardi, Alice V. Alexander, Theresa Allegretta and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Finkelstein v. Kronick et al
as 7:2021cv04337
Defendant:
Fred Robinovitz, Elinor Silver, Harriet Spevack and others
Plaintiff:
Rabbi Joshua Finkelstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vazquez et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01573
Defendant:
Robert Levy, Daniel Rodgers, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John/Jane Does and Juan M. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Horton et al
as 7:2021cv01261
Defendant:
Dino Garcia, Bruce Horton and Shawn Pederson
Plaintiff:
Arlene Arnold and as Arlene Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr
Arnold v. Navistar International Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01236
Defendant:
Jose Maria Alapont, Christian Schulz, Stephen R. D'Arcy and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Avramham v. Doe
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Moshe Avramham and Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Ruprecht Company v. National Retirement Fund et al
as 7:2020cv10886
Defendant:
National Retirement Fund, a Consolidated Multi-Employer Retirement Fund Operated on behalf of Consolidated Union Locals including Unite Here, In Their Capacity as Trustees of the National Retirement Fund: Paul Ades, John Agnello, Noel Beasley, Richard Betty, William Biggerstaff, Harold Bock, Gary Bonadonna, James Brubaker, James Claus, Donn, in their Capacity as Administrators of the National Retirement Fund in the years 2013 and 2014 names unknown at this tmie and hereby designated as John and/or Jane Does and/or their successors and others
Plaintiff:
The Ruprecht Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Avramham v. NYS OMH
as 1:2020cv09382
Plaintiff:
Moshe Avramham and Marvin Arnold Pollack
Defendant:
NYS OMH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contemporary Visions, LLC v. Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG et al
as 7:2020cv08744
Plaintiff:
Contemporary Visions, LLC doing business as Sonneman A Way of Light
Defendant:
ARNOLD & RICHTER CINE TECHNIK GMBH & CO, ARRI, Inc. and Arnold & Richter Cine Technik GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
