Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Arnold et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
Dean F Arnold , Carolyn L Arnold and Dorothy G Brink
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation , Chesapeake Operating LLC and Chesapeake Energy Marketing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Darley v. Palmer et al
as 5:2015cv01287
Plaintiff:
Monica Dell Darley
Defendant:
Juama Tramel Palmer, Paccar Financial Corporation, Arnold Transportation Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith , Ashley Arnold and Katlyn Dingman
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Arnold et al
as 5:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shawn E Arnold and Lytle Soule & Curlee PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tims et al v. Titan Transportation et al
as 6:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Arnold Tims and Kim Wesley
Defendant:
Titan Transportation and Glenn Ross Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arnold v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Felicia B. Arnold
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Pamela Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stuck v. Arnold et al
as 5:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Edward Stuck
Defendant:
Mike Arnold, Troy Wall and Charles Gass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oklahoma Observer et al v. Patton et al
as 5:2014cv00905
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Observer , Arnold Hamilton , Guardian US and others
Defendant:
Robert Patton and Anita Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
