Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Smith et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06323
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , Ameron International Corporation, Ametek, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Miriam P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: National Healthcare Resource
as 11-60554
Petitioner:
In re: NATIONAL HEALTHCARE RESOURCES, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
DARLENE S. DONALD, ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY, doing business as Royal & Sunalliance and GENEX SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Samuel et al v Anco Insulations, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00178
Defendant:
Anco Insulations, Inc., Arrowood Indemnity Company, Bituminous Fire and Marine Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Opal Farr Samuel, Sheranda Lynn Samuel and Saundra Lafredia Samuel-McGowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Arrowood Indemnity Company fka Royal Insurance Company of America et al v. Hidalgo County, Texas et al
as 7:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Arrowood Indemnity Company fka Royal Insurance Company of America , Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation and Landmark American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Hidalgo County, Texas and Al Cardenas Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Donald v. Arrowood Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2010cv00227
Defendant:
Arrowood Indemnity Company, Genex Services, Inc. , National Healthcare Resources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene S. Donald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley et al
as 4:2009cv01862
Plaintiff:
Beth D. Bradley, Beth D. Bradley and Arrowood Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Arrowood Indemnity Company v United National Insurance Company et al
as 7:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
Arrowood Indemnity Company
Defendant:
United National Insurance Company, Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation, Landmark American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
