Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Huss v. Opus Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00456
Plaintiff: Kathleen Huss
Defendant: Opus Medical, Inc. and Arthrocare Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mcilvaine v. Arthrocare Corporation et al
as 9:2008cv80343
Plaintiff: John J. Mcilvaine, John J. Mcilvaine, John J. Mcilvaine and others
Defendant: Arthrocare Corporation, Arthrocare Corporation, Michael Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
McGuire et al v. Arthrocare Corporation
as 3:2007cv00259
Plaintiff: David McGuire, David McGuire, E. Marlowe Goble and others
Defendant: Arthrocare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ArthroCare Corporation v. Gyrus Medical Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00729
Plaintiff: ArthroCare Corporation
Defendant: Gyrus Medical Inc., Gyrus ENT L.L.C. and Gyrus ACMI Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Arthrocare Corporation v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00092
Plaintiff: Arthrocare Corporation, Arthrocare Corporation, Arthrocare Corporation and others
Defendant: Cardinal Health 200 Inc, Cardinal Health 200 Inc, Cardinal Health 200 Inc and others
Counter Claimant: Cardinal Health 200 Inc and Cardinal Health 200 Inc
Counter Defendant: Arthrocare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ARTHROCARE V SMITH & NEPHEW
as 04-1487
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee: ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee: ETHICON
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
ARTHROCARE V SMITH & NEPHEW
as 04-1352
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
ARTHROCARE V SMITH & NEPHEW We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-1323
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee: ARTHROCARE CORPORATION
Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee: ETHICON, INC.
ETHICON, INC:
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?