Cases 11 - 20 of 2,834
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shaffer v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff:
Dottie Ann Shaffer
Defendant:
3M Company, American Standard Inc., Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , Eaton Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , 3M Company, American Standard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Allen et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen and Lou Ann Allen
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Baldonado et al v. Arvinmeritor Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00833
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor Inc., BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CNH America LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Daimler Trucks North America LLC, Paccar Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Baldonado and Virginia Baldonado
Cross Claimant:
CNH Industrial America LLC (fka CNH America LLC), IMO Industries Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee:
A W CHESTERTON CO, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor / Appellee:
ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP, UNION CARBIDE CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor - Appellee:
ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP, UNION CARBIDE CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee:
A W CHESTERTON CO, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor / Appellee:
EATON CORP, ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP and others
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 13-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE PAYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS INC, AKA Buffalo Pumps Inc, ALDRICH COMPANY and others
Debtor - Appellee:
EATON CORP, ITT CORP, SPRINKMANN SONS CORP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
