Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Boydston v. Dumas et al
as 2:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Shane Ellie Boydston
Defendant:
Sebastian County Detention Center, Captain Dumas, Sgt Eddie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Maurice Richardson
Defendant:
Sgt Smith, Captain Dumas, Officer Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Hakim Raekwon Williams
Defendant:
Corporal Ashley Smith, Sergeant Eddie Smith, Corporal Medlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Smith
as 2:2022cv02109
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Norris
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Ashley Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Smith
as 2:2022cv02103
Plaintiff:
Dominque Edward Buchanan
Defendant:
Administration Department of Sebastian County Detention Center and Ashley Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Runion et al
as 2:2022cv02029
Plaintiff:
Mark Trenton Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Captain Dumas, Corporal Ashley Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Ashley Smith, Eddie Smith, Corporal Toon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGill v. Runion et al
as 2:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
Micheal Patrick McGill
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Captain Dumas, Corporal Ashley Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Runion et al
as 2:2021cv02193
Plaintiff:
Mark Trenton Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Manager Eddie Smith, Captain Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ary v. Dumas et al
as 2:2021cv02183
Plaintiff:
James Ary
Defendant:
Captain Dumas, Corporal Ashley Smith, Guard White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
