Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC et al v. BB&T Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00296
Plaintiff:
Pollin Patent Licensing, LLC and Autoscribe Corporation
Defendant:
BB&T Corporation , Branch Banking and Trust Company and BB&T Financial, FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
DAVIS v. BELLSOUTH SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2010cv00977
Plaintiff:
AARON D. DAVIS
Defendant:
BELLSOUTH SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES , BELLSOUTH LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES , AT&T INTEGRATED DISABILITY SERVICE CENTER and others
Mediator:
NAHOMI HARKAVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
AT&T Corporation et al v. Connect, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corporation and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Defendant:
Connect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
BORCHARDT v. KING, et al
as 1:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
CURTIS BORCHARDT
Defendant:
KELLY S. KING, CHRISTOPHER L HENSON, DARYL N. BIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
CLAY et al v. C T CORPORATION SYSTEM
as 1:2008cv00925
Plaintiff:
PERCY LEE CLAY and DIANE CLAY
Defendant:
C T CORPORATION SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AT&T Corporation v. Qualyst, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00132
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corporation
Defendant:
Qualyst, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
