Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Burnett et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00741
Plaintiff:
Lillia Burnett , Paul Anderson , Brittany Anderson and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , Pantech Wireless Inc. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gorss Motels Inc. v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Gorss Motels Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. , AT&T Inc. , AT&T Mobility Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Telecommunications Act
Lo v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
David Lo
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Citigroup Inc. v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04333
Plaintiff:
Citigroup Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Services, Inc. , AT&T Intellectual Property LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dollar Phone Access, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2014cv03240
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dollar Phone Access, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ziplink, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
Ziplink, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Pryor et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00536
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility Services, Inc. and others
Aid Names Being Fictitious, The Persons Intended Being Those Who Aided And Abetted The Unlawful Co:
John and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Natalie Pryor and Bonita Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pasquella v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
John Pasquella
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Porto v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2012cv00746
Plaintiff:
Jayne Porto
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
