Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Baah v. AT&T Inc. West, et al.
as 24-2541
Plaintiff:
ALEX BAAH
Defendant:
AT&T INC. WEST, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT AND T CORP. and others
Reddersen v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2392
Plaintiff:
ATHENA REDDERSEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 24-531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 24-306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 23-4027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Ph.D., MBA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Jeffrey Klein v. AT and T Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09979
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Klein
Defendant:
AT and T, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barton v. DirecTV LLC
as 3:2021cv05423
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Inc and DirecTV LLC
Plaintiff:
Nathen Barton and Nathen W Barton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ross v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 4:2019cv06669
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, One Touch Direct LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seth Shapiro v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2019cv08972
Plaintiff:
Seth Shapiro
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Sequential Technology International, LLC
Petitioner:
CoWorx Staffing Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
