Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jackson et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Andrea Jackson and Gerad Jackson
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and Fidelity Workplace Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hearn v. Bishop et al
as 3:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Charles Hearn
Defendant:
Dwayne G Bishop, V A & T Inc, Congregational Security Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
McNaughten v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2020cv00936
Plaintiff:
Brenda McNaughten
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Dunham v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv03384
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., Jeff Adcock and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Dunham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mosley-Lovings v. AT&T Corp et al
as 3:2018cv01145
Plaintiff:
Tammy Mosley-Lovings
Defendant:
AT&T Corp , AT&T Inc , Southwestern Bell Telephone LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyer v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00372
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T, Inc., Jaime Benavides and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Etta Boyer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hafiz v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03092
Plaintiff:
Khalid Hafiz
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Moore et al v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 et al
as 1:2015cv00182
Plaintiff:
Sonya Lynn Moore and Robby K Eason
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1, AT&T Disability Income Program and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Batsel v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2014cv01539
Plaintiff:
Cherie Batsel
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Carrick v. Communication Workers of America et al
as 3:2014cv00372
Plaintiff:
Calvin R Carrick
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc and Communication Workers of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
