Cases 1 - 10 of 1,119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Burris v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burris
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
IN RE AT&T SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 3:2024cv01196
Not Yet Classified:
AT&T Inc Securities Litigation
Plaintiff:
John Brazinsky, Teachers Retirement System of the City of New York, New York City Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, Randall L Stephenson, John T Stankey and others
Petitioner:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Bridget N Smagala Revocable Trust, Suresh Kodali and others
MCGREEVY et al
as 1:2024cv04097
Plaintiff:
KELLY MCGREEVY and STEVE SENTI
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and DirecTV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Timothy Nichols
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Head v. AT&T Inc.
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Stephen Head
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ragland v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Vincent Ragland
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Davis v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Davis
Defendant:
John Warner and B.C. & T., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Telford v. AT&T, INC.
as 3:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Peter Telford
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
