Cases 1 - 10 of 5,502
Gabler v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1199
Petitioner:
VICTOR GABLER
Respondent:
MARC FAIRBAIRN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Bethea v. City of Tulsa Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ralph C Bethea
Defendant:
City of Tulsa Oklahoma, The, City of Tulsa Attorney General, The, State of Oklahoma, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1192
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Chacon Ovalle v. Garland
as 24-9530
Petitioner:
LIDIA GUISE CHACON OVALLE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Barrales v. Garland
as 24-9529
Petitioner:
CASIMIRO ROMERO BARRALES
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Santiago v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 2:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Isaiah E Santiago
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
People of the State of Colorado (PS) et al v. Democratic Party of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Colorado and Kurt Overturf
Defendant:
Democratic Party of Colorado, National (US) Democratic Party, Dominion Voting Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
