Cases 31 - 40 of 464
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
State of Ohio, ex rel Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv02700
Defendant:
Aaron Michael Jones, Jovita Migdaris Cedeno Luna, Andrea Horvath and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Potter v. Wehrle et al
as 2:2022cv02473
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Potter
Defendant:
Debra Gorrell Wehrle, Aubrey Cook, Ohio Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00778
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Giwa v. U.S. Attorney General
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Olamide Halimah Giwa
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Redden v. Black et al
as 1:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
James F. Redden
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Black and Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
