Cases 1 - 10 of 367
William Windsor v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-3281
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WINDSOR
Joseph Jones v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-3240
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JONES
Paul Lacombe v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-2961
Plaintiff:
PAUL K. LACOMBE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Brandon Wyche v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-3123
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. WYCHE
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Marshall Brown v. Commissioner Delaware Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2935
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE, WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and COMMISSIONER DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL BROWN
Ronald Jackson v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-2927
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Plaintiff:
RONALD B. JACKSON
Matthew Jones v. Delaware State Police, et al
as 24-2992
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE, DELAWARE STATE POLICE and others
James Riley v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-2605
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. RILEY, DEDRP
Michael Broomer v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-2887
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOMER
Amir Fatir v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-2458
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
AMIR FATIR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
