Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Jerry Stevens, et al v. Joseph Hayes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-51209
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY STEVENS, DEBORAH STEVENS and DAVID GEOFFRION
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH HAYES, VICTOR MORALES, JOHN F. SMITH and others
Stevens et al v. Hayes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00550
Plaintiff: David Geoffrion, Deborah Stevens and Jerry Stevens
Defendant: Joseph Hayes, Abigail Kimbell, Victor Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Oregon Natural Desert Associat, et al v. USFS, et al
as 11-35415
Plaintiff - Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Abigail Kimbell, Chief, MALHEUR NATIONAL FOREST, Gary L. Benes, Supervisor, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, D. Robert Lohn, Regional Administrator and others
Intervenor-Defendant: OREGON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, SHERRIE ALLEN, HARLEY ALLEN and others
Great Old Broads For Wildernes, et al v. Abigail Kimbell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-16183
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREAT OLD BROADS FOR WILDERNESS and THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY
Defendant - Appellee: ABIGAIL KIMBELL, Chief, United States Forest Service, MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary of Agriculture, EDWARD MONNING, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Supervisor and others
Oregon Natural Desert Associat, et al v. Oregon Cattlemen's Association, et al
as 11-35331
Plaintiff - Appellee: OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Abigail Kimbell, Chief, MALHEUR NATIONAL FOREST, Gary L. Benes, Supervisor, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, D. Robert Lohn, Regional Administrator and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: OREGON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, SHERRIE ALLEN, HARLEY ALLEN and others
Beau Bradley, et al v. Edward Schafer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36141
Plaintiff - Appellant: BEAU R. BRADLEY, DBA Bradley Livestock LC, WOOD'S THREE CREEK RANCHES, LTD. and CHARLES G. WOOD
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARD T. SCHAFER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ABIGAIL KIMBELL, in her official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service and others
Rock Creek Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al
as 10-35604
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROCK CREEK ALLIANCE, CLARK FORK COALITION, CABINET RESOURCE GROUP and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ABIGAIL KIMBELL, in her official capacitiy as Regional Forester for the Northern Region and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: REVETT SILVER COMPANY
Rock Creek Alliance, et al v. Revett Silver Company, et al
as 10-35598
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCK CREEK ALLIANCE, CLARK FORK COALITION, CABINET RESOURCE GROUP and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ABIGAIL KIMBELL, in her official capacitiy as Regional Forester for the Northern Region and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: REVETT SILVER COMPANY
Rock Creek Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al
as 10-35594
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCK CREEK ALLIANCE, CLARK FORK COALITION, CABINET RESOURCE GROUP and others
Intervenor: REVETT SILVER, company
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ABIGAIL KIMBELL, in her official capacitiy as Regional Forester for the Northern Region and others
Rocky Mountain Wild et al v. Vilsack et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01272
Plaintiff: Colorado Wild and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant: Tom Vilsack, Abigail Kimbell, Thomas Malecek and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1600 National Forest Managment Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?