Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Abubakar Ahmed v. Arizona State University, et al
as 19-15086
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL ROPER, named as Arizona State Police Officer, JOHN CHIPOLSKY, agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, SUZANNE SOLOMON, named as Arizona State University Police Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABUBAKAR HUSSEIN AHMED
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 15-25 and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 15-20
Abubakar Ahmed v. Arizona State University, et al
as 17-17333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABUBAKAR HUSSEIN AHMED
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, through its Campus Police Department, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JOHN CHIPOLSKY, agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Abubakar Ahmed v. Arizona Dept. of Public Safety, et al
as 17-16217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABUBAKAR HUSSEIN AHMED
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, JANICE K. BREWER, Individually and in her official capacity as Chief Officer of the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS), ROBERT HALLIDAY, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS) and others
Ahmed v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 2:2016cv00935
Plaintiff:
Abubakar Hussein Ahmed
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Janice K Brewer, Robert Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmed v. Arizona Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
Abubakar Hussein Ahmed
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Transportation, Jeff Pfafenback and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahmed v. Arizona State University et al
as 2:2014cv01626
Plaintiff:
Abubakar Hussein Ahmed
Defendant:
Arizona State University, Federal Bureau of Investigation, John Chipolsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
