Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Harkins v. Accounting Fulfillment Services, LLC
as 8:2023cv00816
Plaintiff:
Colton Harkins
Defendant:
Accounting Fulfillment Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Doherty v. Accounting Fulfillment Services et al
as 1:2022cv11960
Plaintiff:
Shannon Doherty
Defendant:
Accounting Fulfillment Services, LLC, Brendon Pack, Michael Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA)
Michael Berger, et al v. Accounting Fulfillment Servic, et al
as 16-90015
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BERGER, JACOB BULLOCK, RYAN CARROLL and others
Respondent:
ACCOUNTING FULFILLMENT SERVICES, LLC, A Foreign Limited Liability Corporation, MANHATTAN PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., A Foreign Corporation, MICHAEL SAVAGE, an individual and others
Michael Berger, et al v. Accounting Fulfillment Servic, et al
as 16-15211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL BERGER, Individually And On Behalf Of All Those Similarly Situated, JACOB BULLOCK, Individually And On Behalf Of All Those Similarly Situated, RYAN CARROLL, Individually And On Behalf Of All Those Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ACCOUNTING FULFILLMENT SERVICES, LLC, A Foreign Limited Liability Corporation, MANHATTAN PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., A Foreign Coporation, MICHAEL SAVAGE, an individual and others
:
SERVICE
Berger et al v. Accounting Fulfillment Services, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv00744
Plaintiff:
Michael Berger , Jacob Bullock , Ryan Carroll and others
Defendant:
Accounting Fulfillment Services, LLC , Manhattan Professional Group, Inc. , Michael Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
