Cases 21 - 29 of 29
ACOSTA-OLIVERAS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv63420
Plaintiff:
ARQUELIO ACOSTA-OLIVERAS, ARQUELIO ACOSTA-OLIVERAS, ARQUELIO ACOSTA-OLIVERAS and others
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ORION IP LLC v. Xerox Corporation et al
as 6:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
ORION IP LLC, ORION IP LLC, ORION IP LLC and others
Defendant:
Xerox Corporation, Xerox Corporation, Xerox Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Overstock.Com Inc, Nordstrom Inc, Recreational Equipment Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
ORION IP LLC, ORION IP LLC, ORION IP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Connie Damico, et al. v. Ace Hardware Corp., et al.
as ALN/2:06-CV-01168
Plaintiff:
Connie Damico
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corp
Nilssen, et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al
as 1:2004cv05363
Plaintiff:
Ole K Nilssen and GEO Foundation Ltd
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Costco Wholesale Corporation , Home Depot, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Ikea IL LLC and Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Ole K Nilssen and GEO Foundation Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NIKKEN USA V ROBINSONS-MAY
as 02-1106
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
ACE HARDWARE CORP., ACE HARDWARE CORP., ACE HARDWARE CORP. and others
NIKKEN USA V ROBINSONS-MAY
as 02-1006
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
ACE HARDWARE CORP., ACE HARDWARE CORP., ACE HARDWARE CORP. and others
NIKKEN USA V ROBINSONS-MAY
as 01-1420
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
ACE HARDWARE CORP., AMERICAN DRUG STORES, INC., BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
AMES DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PRICESMART and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
NIKKEN USA, INC. (aka Nikken, Inc.), NIKKEN USA, INC. (aka Nikken, Inc.) and NIKKEN USA, INC. (aka Nikken, Inc.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
