Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Hinds, et al. v. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 3:2022cv04730
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hinds, et al., Deborah Hinds, Michael Hawkins and others
Defendant:
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Apotex Corp., ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Valerie Vig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Clearlake et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv06212
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Clearlake and The People of the State of California, by and through the City of Clearlake
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Lakeport et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv04007
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, acting by and through the City of Lakeport, City of Lakeport and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv08438
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Camber Pharmaceutical, Inc., Emcure Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Fullerton et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02321
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
city of fullerton, The People of the State of California, by and through Fullerton City Attorney Richard D. Jones and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Alameda, California et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02307
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
County of Alameda, California and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
