Cases 1 - 10 of 3,747
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., GENERAL MOTORS LLC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
San Miguel Hospital Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00903
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Allergen Finance, LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
San Miguel Hospital Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Alta Vista Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City Of Lakewood v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2018op45240
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Lakewood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marion County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45529
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Marion County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45091
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2217
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2214
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2215
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2213
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2216
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
