Cases 71 - 80 of 9,676
COUNTY OF MONMOUTH et al v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 2:2023cv21001
Plaintiff:
COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, OHIO CARPENTERS' HEALTH FUND, JACQUELINE HARRIS and others
Defendant:
APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Latiolais v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05228
Plaintiff:
Nicole Latiolais
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Accord Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HURST v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv20308
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. HURST
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., ACETERIS, LCC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MANTALIS v. AUROBINDO PHARM, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv14463
Plaintiff:
STELIOS MANTALIS
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARM, LTD., HETERO DRUGS LTD., HETERO LABS LTD. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Desjarlais v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2023op45008
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Desjarlais
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2217
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2214
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2215
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2213
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2216
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
