Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WDM Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
WDM Inc. d/b/a Wood Designs and WDM Inc. doing business as Wood Designs
Defendant:
United States of America, Office of the United States Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine C. Tai and others
Shoe Cover Magic, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Shoe Cover Magic, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Trade Representative, United States and others
P.R. et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Mark A. Morgan, Donald J Trump, Jeffrey A Rosen and others
Plaintiff:
R.R. S., O.W. J.M., J.S. S.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
S & B BLESSING LLC v. Morgan et al
as 1:2020cv24154
Plaintiff:
S & B BLESSING LLC
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Mark A. Morgan, US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and Mark A. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ball v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv23867
Defendant:
Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF, Rachel Rojas, Assist. Sec. Consul Carl C Risch and others
Plaintiff:
Sherice L Ball and Saba ####
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03157
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Enriquez Turcios et al v. Wolf et al Example:
as 4:2020cv01982
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Mark A. Morgan, Donald Trump, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Enriquez, Josue Enriquez, Elba Guerrero Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hajiabadi v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv10807
Defendant:
Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF, John Doe 2, Acting Commissioner Mark A Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammadmahdi Agheli Hajiabadi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
