Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Martinez Jimenez v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
as 24-2491
Petitioner:
VICTOR MARTINEZ JIMENEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Current or Acting Director; Current or Acting Field Office Director, of San Francisco Field Office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Current or Acting Secretary, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Current or Acting and others
Hodge v. Mayorkas
as 23-7988
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSVALDO HODGE
Respondent / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, THOMAS BROPHY, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Alpha Mansaray v. Andrea King-Wessels
as 21-7166
Petitioner:
ALPHA IBRAHIM BAH MANSARAY
Respondent:
ANDREA KING-WESSELS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Howard County Detention Center, FRANCISCO MADRIGAL, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations Baltimore Field Office, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Jose Tejada v. David O'Neill
as 21-7077
Petitioner:
JOSE DENIS CARDONA TEJADA
Respondent:
DAVID C. O'NEILL, in his official capacity as Acting Field Office Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Washington Field Office, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Huskey et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2021cv00868
Defendant:
Director Tracy Renaud, Field Office Directo Lisa Bradley, Attorney General US Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E Huskey and Aidi Yu
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551
Saleh v. Pastore
as 21-1073
Defendant / Appellee:
Gina Pastore, as Brooklyn Field Office Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, Lee Bowes, as Acting Field Office Director, Northeast Region, USCIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tarek Youssef Hassan Saleh
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al
as 21-15197
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant:
NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 21-15195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director and MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Adil Abuzeid, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-5003
Defendant / Appellee:
Peter Gaynor, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kirt Thompson, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Jeffrey Rosen, Acting Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melissa Anne Abuzeid and Adil Mohamed Abuzeid, M.D.
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al
as 20-16690
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant:
NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
