Cases 1 - 10 of 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021at00607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00879
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ronald Emrit v. Secretary Betsy Devos, et al
as 20-13362
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, BETSY DEVOS, Secretary, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Ronald Emrit v. Betsy Devos, et al
as 20-11763
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, BETSY DEVOS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Ronald Emrit v. Betsy DeVos, et al
as 20-5108
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Education, Action Financial Services, Betsy DeVos, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Ronald Emrit v. Betsy DeVos, et al
as 20-55417
Defendant / Appellee:
NE1NET, BETSY DEVOS, Secretary, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Ronald Emrit v. Secretary, US Department of E, et al
as 20-11429
Defendant / Appellee:
NELNET, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, BETSY DEVOS, Secretary United States Department of Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00773
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ronald Emrit v. Elisabeth DeVos, Secretary, et al
as 20-40228
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, NELNET and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
