Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Raul Mendez v. ADA County, et al
as 23-35488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ADA COUNTY, ADA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ADA COUNTY TREASURER and others
Raul Mendez v. County of Ada, et al
as 23-35224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL MENDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ADA, ADA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ADA COUNTY TREASURER and others
Mendez v. Ada County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Defendant:
Ada County, Ada County Commissioners, Ada County Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. Ada County et al
as 1:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Defendant:
Ada County, Ada County Commissioners, Ada County Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Mendez v. Ada County, et al
as 20-35917
Defendant / Appellee:
REPUBLIC SERVICES, SCOTT WILLIAMS, employee of the Ada County Billing Services, ADA COUNTY BILLING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL MENDEZ
Raul Mendez v. Ada County, et al
as 20-35748
Defendant / Appellee:
REPUBLIC SERVICES, SCOTT WILLIAMS, employee of the Ada County Billing Services, ADA COUNTY BILLING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL MENDEZ
Richard Drennon v. Idaho Legislative Representati, et al
as 20-35460
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID NOLAND, Idaho Tax Commission Commissioner, JULIE BRYANT, IDOC, CHRISTEN LEWIS, Tax Enforcement Official, Agent, Employee and Representative and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD J. DRENNON
Mendez v. Ada County, et al
as 1:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Ada County, Republic Services, Ada County Billing Services and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones et al v. Idaho Legislative Representatives et al
as 1:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones, Robert Coy, Richard J Drennon and others
Defendant:
Idaho Legislative Representatives, State of Idaho, Idaho Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
