Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Reberger v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2017cv00552
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Harold Mike Byrne, Quentin Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helfrich v. Laxalt et al
as 2:2017cv02392
Respondent:
James Dzurenda, David Gamble, Adam Paul Laxalt and others
Petitioner:
Peter Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lusan Rahman v. Brian Williams, et al
as 17-16781
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUSAN RAHMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN A. WILLIAMS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Newton v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv02038
Respondent:
Adam Paul Laxalt and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Charles Clinton Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01963
Plaintiff:
Marion Anderson
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, James Cox, Brian Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Wickham et al
as 2:2017cv01949
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, J Graham, Adam Paul Laxalt and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porretti v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2017cv01745
Defendant:
Aranas, Dzurenda, Linda Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Porretti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wirth v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2017cv00376
Defendant:
CCS III, Dawan Deal, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Wirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Horta-Castrejon v. Sessions et al
as 2:2017cv01567
Defendant:
Al Gallman, Jeanne Kent, Adam Paul Laxalt and others
Petitioner:
Raul Horta-Castrejon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
William Witter v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 17-15972
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM WITTER
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON, Warden and ADAM PAUL LAXALT, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
