Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Bell et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Alonzo May
Respondent:
Michael Bell, Carol Savage, Jennifer Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Bell et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Alonzo May
Defendant:
Michael Bell, Carol Savage, Jennifer Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. McLane, et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Respondent:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welsh v. McLane et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Chris Greenwalt, Michael Searchy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L WALKER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, CITY OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIERCE v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08168
Plaintiff:
ADAM PIERCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01431
Plaintiff:
Adam Pierce
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Samuel San Miguel v. Marsha McLane, et al
as 20-10171
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SEARCY, Op. Spec, TCCO, CHRIS SALINAS, TCCO Case Manager, TAMRA DEWBRE, Clinical Thearapist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL SAN MIGUEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
