Cases 21 - 30 of 209
Ontiveros v. Grosse Pointe, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10626
Plaintiff:
Paulo Ontiveros
Defendant:
City of Grosse Ponte, John Alcorn, Joseph Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hobson et al v. The Spiratex Company
as 2:2023cv10547
Plaintiff:
Michael Hobson, Adam Rich, Aisha Tackett and others
Defendant:
The Spiratex Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Laws v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Addis Adam Laws, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Division of Child Support Services, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rice et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv11345
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley Rice
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Robert J. Kinggo III, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garavaglia v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael Garavaglia
Defendant:
Gogebic County, Josh Elias, Adam Zak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. Alpine, Township of
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Adams Outdoor Advertising, LP
Defendant:
Alpine, Township of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cassaday #71417-509 v. Sparrow Health System et al
as 1:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cassaday #71417-509
Defendant:
Sparrow Health System, Lansing Radiology, Ugar Toemet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
